That does not mean that he cannot claim for
Posted: Tue Jan 07, 2025 6:39 am
Final part
At the end of the page there is a certification that must be signed by the worker and the company in duplicate (you keep one copy of the contract and the company another).
By means of the payslip, the company certifies that the data it writes are true. In particular, it certifies that it pays a certain amount to Social Security on behalf of the worker, and another to the Treasury (we will see these amounts later). Therefore, the worker must accept this as true, and if the company does not do so, it is the company's problem, not the worker's. It is usual that, when the income tax return is to be made in the spring, the company sends a "withholding certificate", where these concepts are summarized for the entire year. But in the event that the company does not send this "withholding certificate", the payslips for the entire year are sufficient certification: the "withholding certificate" is only a summary of all the payslips.
This is why payslips are stamped by the company and signed by someone with the power to certify this (the CEO or the HR director or someone like that). In practice, many companies hong kong phone data today send payslips by email, without a stamp or signature. This email should be kept, as it is usually just as valid as the signed document. If you need it signed (for example, because the bank requires it for a loan), you can ask the HR department for it, which is obliged to give it to you.
Conversely, at the bottom of the payslip it is usually written “I received” and then the signature of the worker… when the worker signs that he is acknowledging that he has received that money, and that therefore he will not claim it in the future. other reasons, it simply means that he will not say “hey, they did not give me that money”. If for example the worker was supposed to receive €1234, but the company makes a mistake in the calculation and only puts €1100 and pays him €1100, by signing the “I received” of the €1100 the worker agrees not to claim the €1100, but of course he can and should claim the missing €134. The same can be said of anything else that the payslip reflects, such as professional category, seniority, etc.
Just like before, nowadays, when payrolls are sent by email, the employee does not sign anything... but since he receives his money by transfer anyway, the proof of the transfer is sufficient for the company.
At the end of the page there is a certification that must be signed by the worker and the company in duplicate (you keep one copy of the contract and the company another).
By means of the payslip, the company certifies that the data it writes are true. In particular, it certifies that it pays a certain amount to Social Security on behalf of the worker, and another to the Treasury (we will see these amounts later). Therefore, the worker must accept this as true, and if the company does not do so, it is the company's problem, not the worker's. It is usual that, when the income tax return is to be made in the spring, the company sends a "withholding certificate", where these concepts are summarized for the entire year. But in the event that the company does not send this "withholding certificate", the payslips for the entire year are sufficient certification: the "withholding certificate" is only a summary of all the payslips.
This is why payslips are stamped by the company and signed by someone with the power to certify this (the CEO or the HR director or someone like that). In practice, many companies hong kong phone data today send payslips by email, without a stamp or signature. This email should be kept, as it is usually just as valid as the signed document. If you need it signed (for example, because the bank requires it for a loan), you can ask the HR department for it, which is obliged to give it to you.
Conversely, at the bottom of the payslip it is usually written “I received” and then the signature of the worker… when the worker signs that he is acknowledging that he has received that money, and that therefore he will not claim it in the future. other reasons, it simply means that he will not say “hey, they did not give me that money”. If for example the worker was supposed to receive €1234, but the company makes a mistake in the calculation and only puts €1100 and pays him €1100, by signing the “I received” of the €1100 the worker agrees not to claim the €1100, but of course he can and should claim the missing €134. The same can be said of anything else that the payslip reflects, such as professional category, seniority, etc.
Just like before, nowadays, when payrolls are sent by email, the employee does not sign anything... but since he receives his money by transfer anyway, the proof of the transfer is sufficient for the company.