It’s as if the user experience is like the final stage of a paint job, where

[rifat28dddd]

After: Use the atomic design model to establish the relationships of components, and the design sketch can be updated at the same time with one click, greatly improving efficiency. Incorporating engineering thinking into the entire design process is a difficult but crucial habit change, otherwise engineering design will just become an additional burden. This problem is not limited to designers. We have also had similar problems in the production and research teams. For example, they treat “experience polishing” as an extra job and often leave the optimization of the details of the experience until the R&D or even testing is completed, they can hide problems in the process and finally present a problem.



imperfections can be covered up with simple touch-ups. However, in real-world vietnam phone numbers work, due to time pressure, this process is often rushed and the effect is greatly reduced. I don’t deny that the final polish is necessary, but the backbone of the user experience must be the product of engineering and process. Especially when dealing with large-scale, long-term, and continuously iterative products, the final experience should be a systematic project, not just a final polish.



. To summarize Going back to the original question, our goal is to solve some of the challenges that designers and engineers face in collaboration through engineering design. Specifically, the solution is as follows: . Differences in the thought structures of designers and engineers: Designers introduce engineering thinking methods into the design process and use engineering methods to produce design drafts. In this way, the project draft not only complies with the design principles, but also has the operationality for engineering implementation.